Solidarity 101
"Those who don't learn from history are bound
to repeat it." - Winston Churchill
I have been trying to figure out just what happened to
the Solidarity movement in BC in 1983. I am really worried because
I know there was an enormous outpouring of energy then, and then the
movement was destroyed. I was away working in Ontario at the time,
but I noticed that lots of people who were here when it happened didn't
seem to remember too clearly what had transpired, except there did
seem to be a repeating mantra of "Jack Munro sold us out." So
I went looking for some answers. Here's what I found.
FIRST, I looked it up in the BC Encyclopedia:
SOLIDARITY
SOLIDARITY was a coalition of labour unions and community and advocacy
groups formed in July 1983 to fight the austerity program (a policy
of "restraint") introduced by the SOCIAL CREDIT PARTY government
of Bill BENNETT. The coalition was led initially by Art Kube, head
of the BC FEDERATION OF LABOUR (BCFL), Renate Shearer, a HUMAN RIGHTS
worker, and Father Jim Roberts, a CATHOLIC theologian. Funded by the
union movement, it organized one of the largest political demonstrations
in BC history as tens of thousands of people took to the streets in
rallies and marches to oppose government policies they believed undermined
workers' rights and gutted social services. The government responded
by holding all-night legislative sessions to force through its program.
By Nov, teachers and public employees were on strike and Solidarity
was planning a general strike. But a split developed between the labour
wing of the coalition officially called Operation Solidarity, which
sought to negotiate with the government, and the more radical community
groups known as the Solidarity
Coalition. Once the public employees won a new contract, labour's enthusiasm
for the protest waned. At a meeting in KELOWNA on 13 Nov between Bennett
and Jack MUNRO, vice-president of the BCFL, the premier agreed to make
small changes to his restraint program and Munro agreed to call off
the general strike. The so-called Kelowna Accord outraged many Solidarity
members, who felt it was a betrayal of the larger aims of the movement,
and the coalition subsequently faded away.
***
NEXT I asked someone I am close to in Vancouver. He is a radical leftie
who has had a long involvement in community politics, and who was heavily
involved in Solidarity. He lost his job in 1983, and I understand the
government was actually gunning for him because they hated his militant,
outspoken politics. This is what he said:
O.K. Here goes.
The myth is that Jack Munro alone sold out Solidarity. As the pressure
was building to a general strike, and no other way to advance the struggle
was being put forward, pressure mounted on the Solidarity leaders.
The blue-collar unions were not prepared to strike, the NDP was putting
on massive pressure on their supporters in the leadership of the BCFed
to wind it down and go for the electoral option, the Provincial and
Federal governments were making thinly veiled threats to labour leaders
that they would lose the unions' strike funds and buildings to punitive
fines if they proceeded any further in the direction of civil disobedience.
Some of them even turned their houses and belongings over to their
spouses.
Under this pressure and reflecting their social democratic-liberal
positions, the leaders, both community and labour, came up with a deal
with a mediator. Art Kube, the BC Fed president, came down with a stress
disease [described by another friend as "a broken heart"]
and took to his bed. The executive of the Fed asked for a volunteer
to go and sign the deal with Bill Bennett in Kelowna. No one else wanted
to be tarred with the title, "the union misleader who sold out
Solidarity" so Jack Munro said, I'll do it.
They didn't really trust him so they sent a lightweight
named Gerry Scott to be Munroe's minder. In Kelowna, Scott was sent
by the big boys to take tea and biscuits with Mrs. Bennett in the kitchen
while the other two shook hands in the living room.
The only specific sell-out that Munroe made was to give
away a side deal that gave the teachers some benefits [or as another
friend says, the teachers were in a legal position to strike]. There
was no signed agreement. It was verbal. Even the terms of this verbal
agreement were torn up in short order by the Socreds.
The community players still harbour massive resentment
with the way that labour leaders called the shots with almost a disdain
for the community sector even though the community leaders and the
BCFed leader, Larry Kuehn, agreed to the final deal that went to Kelowna.
This is short but sweet. I trust it does the job.
***
TODAY I went to the BC Encyclopedia again, and lo and behold! there
is a brand-new front-page entry on this very topic!:
Deja Vu All Over Again: The Liberal Government's Restraint Program
Since taking power in May 2001, the provincial Liberal government led
by Gordon Campbell has introduced a series of measures designed to
reduce the size of government and meet the government's objective of
balancing the budget by fiscal year 2003-04. Most dramatically, on
17 Jan 2002, the government unveiled plans to chop about 11,700 jobs
from the provincial payroll over 3 years and to cut government services
by an average of 25% across all provincial ministries. Dozens of government
offices will be closed, a variety of programs and services will be
eliminated and user fees will be imposed for services that remain.
The government also reduced welfare payments, chopped legal aid and
closed a number of courthouses. The cuts followed an extensive core
services review of all government departments, and occurred against
a background of a significant tax decrease, which the government introduced
earlier in an attempt to stimulate the sluggish economy. The announcement
of the cutbacks sparked immediate protests from public sector unions,
including the province's teachers who, as part of the package of legislation,
had a new contract imposed on them. On Saturday, February 23, fourteen
anti-government rallies were held across the province during an organized "Day
of Protest". In Victoria, at the largest gathering, 20,000 protestors
crowded the lawn in front of the legislature. It appears that BC may
be heading into another period of unrest reminiscent of the Solidarity
campaign against the Social Credit government's restraint program introduced
by Premier Bill Bennett in 1983.
What Was Solidarity?
There are surprising similarities between the Campbell government's
recent policies and the program introduced by Bill Bennett's
Socreds in July 1983. Bennett had succeeded his father, W.A.C. Bennett,
as leader of the Social Credit Party in 1973 and was elected premier
two years later. Similar to the Liberals in 2001, when Social Credit
came to power in 1975 they accused the New Democratic government, which
they had replaced, with gross mismanagement of the province's finances
and inaugurated a period of fiscal "restraint." (The charges
of fiscal irresponsibility turned out to be exaggerated.) Unlike the
Liberals in 2001, however, the Socreds did not cut taxes; instead,
they raised taxes along with a variety of other fees and charges in
order to increase government revenues.
The Bennett Socreds managed to win a narrow election victory in 1979,
after which the provincial economy began to decline into severe
recession. By 1982 the prices of BC's natural resources had fallen
dramatically and, along with them, government revenues from various
fees and royalties. At the same time the unemployment rate rose, as
did spending on social assistance. The government budgeted a deficit
and responded by initiating spending restraints, including a cap on
public sector wage increases. Even so, the public was unprepared for
the cost-cutting program introduced by Premier Bennett once he had
won re-election in May 1983. In July the minister of finance introduced
his budget and revealed the extent of the government's austerity plans,
chief among them to cut the civil service by 25% and to sell off or
shut down a wide variety of government services and agencies. At the
same time the government undercut its cost-cutting exercise, at least
with critics, by embarking on a series of megaprojects, including SkyTrain
in Vancouver, construction of the Coquihalla Highway, the development
of coal resources in the Northeast, and Expo 86. So at the same time
as the government was
cutting social assistance and laying off public servants, it remained
committed to funding hugely expensive infrastructure projects as a
way of stimulating the economy.
Government plans sparked the largest mobilization of anti-government
popular protest in the history of the province. A coalition was mobilized
that brought together the labour movement, women's groups, human rights
and poverty activists, teachers and tenants. The
union movement formed Operation Solidarity, which was part of a wider
organization, the Solidarity Coalition, that included all protesting
groups. A rally in downtown Vancouver on 23 July 1983 attracted 20,000
people, and that was just the beginning. On 10 Aug, 40,000 people jammed
the Empire Stadium. In mid-October more than 50,000 marched through
the streets of the city. On 1 Nov, the BC Government Employees' Union
went on strike, and a week later most teachers walked off the job.
Events seemed to be building toward a massive general strike. However,
before that happened, the labour wing of the protest resolved some
of its differences with the government. Jack Munro, president of the
IWA and vice-president of the BC Federation of Labour, flew to Kelowna
on 13 Nov to meet with Premier Bennett. In return for some small concessions
to the labour movement from the premier, Munro agreed to call off the
strike. This so-called "Kelowna Accord" drew sharp criticism
from social activists, who felt it betrayed the protest, but it broke
the back of the Solidarity movement and the coalition faded away. The
Bennett government continued its restraint program, and BC continued
to experience only marginal economic growth. In 1986, with an election
looming, the premier resigned, ending the Bennett era in BC
politics. Retrospectively it is generally acknowledged that Bennett's
neo-conservative program was a model for similar programs of government
downsizing during the 1990s in Ontario and Alberta. Whether Gordon
Campbell's program, similar in intent if not in detail, evokes a similar
outpouring of popular protest will be seen in the weeks and months
ahead.
***
Obviously not everyone will agree with all of this. I am in the throes
of trying to develop an analysis, myself. Any other historical perspectives
or good tactical analysis is welcome. We do need to figure out what
we're doing.
moe